Skip Navigation

Human Rights Law Review 2008 8(2):295-322; doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngn004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Panditaratne, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Reporting on Hong Kong to UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies: For Better or Worse Since 1997?

Dinusha Panditaratne*

* Assistant Professor at the School of Law, Chinese University of Hong Kong; J.S.D. candidate, Yale Law School (dinushap{at}cuhk.edu.hk).

The year 2007 marked the 10th anniversary of the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region within the People's Republic of China (PRC). In the years leading up to the change of sovereignty on 1 July 1997, the United Kingdom made several international human rights treaties applicable to Hong Kong. These included the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). Since 1997, the treaties have continued to apply to Hong Kong, with the PRC submitting reports on behalf of Hong Kong to United Nations (UN) monitoring committees. The following article examines the reporting process with respect to Hong Kong, focusing on Hong Kong's reports submitted under the ICCPR and ICESCR. It recalls the grave concerns before 1997 about the future of the UN human rights reporting process in Hong Kong and analyses the extent to which that process has changed since 1997. It finds that fears expressed before the change of sovereignty have largely proved unfounded. Nevertheless, the article identifies certain concerns and pinpoints ways to improve the current process.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.