Skip Navigation

Human Rights Law Review 2009 9(1):61-93; doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngn042
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cullen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Collective Complaints System of the European Social Charter: Interpretative Methods of the European Committee of Social Rights

Holly Cullen*

*Reader in Law, Durham Law School (h.a.cullen{at}durham.ac.uk).

The system of collective complaints established by a Protocol to the European Social Charter has now been in force for a decade. The Protocol gives the European Committee on Social Rights (ECSR) the competence to examine complaints by social partner organisations and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). The procedural aspects of the system have been criticised, particularly the lack of remedial powers and the significant role played by the Committee of Ministers. Nonetheless, it is important to examine the practice of the ECSR in deciding collective complaints, which reveals that the ECSR has developed considerable economic and social rights jurisprudence. It has articulated and elaborated on the values underlying the Charter. It has also employed techniques of reasoning drawn in part from the European Court of Human Rights. The collective complaints system can therefore be regarded as a quasi-judicial process—the first in international law specifically for economic and social rights.


This article forms part of a project, ‘Legal Reasoning in Economic and Social Rights Cases’, supported by a Research Leave Grant from the Arts and Humanities Research Council.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.