<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Human Rights Law Review - Advance Access</title>
<link>http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Human Rights Law Review - RSS feed of articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1744-1021</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Human Rights Law Review</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1461-7781</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp027v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp024v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp025v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp029v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp022v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp023v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp026v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp021v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp027v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Limitations to and Derogations from Economic, Social and Cultural Rights]]></title>
<link>http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp027v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article explores the question of limitations to and derogations from economic, social and cultural rights. With regard to limitations, it analyses Article 4 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1966 (ICESCR) (limitations) and its relationship to Article 2(1) of the ICESCR (progressive realisation). It argues that the criteria of Article 4 should be applied as a uniform standard to evaluate all limitations of economic, social and cultural rights, regardless of the reasons for which these limitations are made. This is against the background of the approach of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which draws a distinction between retrogressive measures states may take when they face resource constraints under Article 2(1) on the one hand; and limitations for other reasons under Article 4 on the other hand. With regard to derogations, the question is discussed whether states are permitted to derogate from the ICESCR despite the fact that the ICESCR does not contain a derogation clause. A tendency can be observed in the states&rsquo; and the CESCR&rsquo;s approach to allow for derogations from the ICESCR&rsquo;s labour rights, but to exclude derogations from other ESC rights, in particular from minimum core obligations under these rights.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muller, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:10:34 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/hrlr/ngp027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Limitations to and Derogations from Economic, Social and Cultural Rights]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp024v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Accommodating Muslims in Europe: From Adopting Sharia Law to Religiously Based Opt Outs from Generally Applicable Laws]]></title>
<link>http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp024v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article considers the possibilities for accommodating the growing numbers of Muslims in Europe. Sections 2&ndash;5 examine the compatibility of the adoption of Islamic Law or an Islamic Law system with the European Convention on Human Rights. In particular, section 4 critiques the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the <I>Refah</I> Case. Section 6 considers whether Muslims could be accommodated by the adoption of particular rules of <I>sharia</I> law. Section 7 examines whether some adoption of <I>sharia</I> law could be achieved by allowing more exemptions or opt outs for Muslims from generally applicable laws. Section 8 addresses the possibilities for using <I>sharia</I> law in alternative dispute resolution. Section 9 submits that a more positive and constructive accommodation strategy might be based on close examination of the scope of protection provided to Muslims by the Convention. Finally, Section 10 asks whether the future will be one of a more identifiable category of European Muslims.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McGoldrick, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:07:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/hrlr/ngp024</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Accommodating Muslims in Europe: From Adopting Sharia Law to Religiously Based Opt Outs from Generally Applicable Laws]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp025v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ian Leigh and Roger Masterman, Making Rights Real: The Human Rights Act in its First Decade]]></title>
<link>http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp025v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Townsend, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:34:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/hrlr/ngp025</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ian Leigh and Roger Masterman, Making Rights Real: The Human Rights Act in its First Decade]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp029v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Michelle Foster, International Refugee Law and Socio-Economic Rights: Refuge from Deprivation]]></title>
<link>http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp029v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harvey, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:01:06 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/hrlr/ngp029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Michelle Foster, International Refugee Law and Socio-Economic Rights: Refuge from Deprivation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp022v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing Human Rights Principles in Cases of Gender-based Violence: Opuz v Turkey in the European Court of Human Rights]]></title>
<link>http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp022v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Londono, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 05:17:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/hrlr/ngp022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing Human Rights Principles in Cases of Gender-based Violence: Opuz v Turkey in the European Court of Human Rights]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp023v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Crisis Measures of Institutional Reform for the European Court of Human Rights]]></title>
<link>http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp023v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mowbray, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:39:45 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/hrlr/ngp023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Crisis Measures of Institutional Reform for the European Court of Human Rights]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Recent Developments</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp026v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Books Received]]></title>
<link>http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp026v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 07:32:26 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/hrlr/ngp026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Books Received]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Books Received</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp021v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neil Rees, Katherine Lindsay and Simon Rice, Australian Anti-Discrimination Law: Text, Cases and Materials]]></title>
<link>http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/ngp021v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monaghan QC, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:42:11 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/hrlr/ngp021</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neil Rees, Katherine Lindsay and Simon Rice, Australian Anti-Discrimination Law: Text, Cases and Materials]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>